Cyber bullying(Argumentative Paper) Research Paper

Cyber deterrence(Argumentative ) - Research Paper ExampleInsecurity issues have in turn sparked farthermost-off reaching implications to the users. In particularly, insecurity issues in information technology have been closely associated with internet usability. This comes when the receipts of internet cannot be presently overemphasized. It is for this reason that information technology and security issues become critical. Important, though, have been the concerns on how to address these forms of insecurity. The aspect on information technology that is paramount to this discussion is cyber strong-arm. Cyberbullying has been known to affect loosely the youth especi anyy of school going age and partly adults who often use internet and peregrine phones for communication purposes. As research would have it, cyberbullying has been said to vary with age. However, one thing that remains unclear is whether gender affects cyberbullying. This paper seeks to find out if actually gender i s a factor as far as cyberbulling is concerns. The paper approaches this topic sing different points of views as pointed out by a look of researchers. It involves controversy and issues opposing viewpoints of different researchers to this topic. Background information Cyber bullying has emerged to be the newest platform on which the youths ar increasingly abusing each other tally to (Hopeline 73). The more concerning issue is that there are currently no appropriate techniques that intervene for cyber bullying despite large numbers of kids who access the information technologies. Internet and cellular phone phone communications have been cited as tools for Cyber bullying. According to Hopline, what appalls even more is that Cyber bullying occurs during kids class time. Hopline cites that cyber bullying has far reaching implications on kids, so that the victims (kids) of cyber bullying only feel safe when in their bedrooms. According to Hopline, it does not under all circumstances hold that cyber bullying causes physical harm. However, cyber bullying is mostly associated with occasion of harmful emotional fallout which may cumulate to other gar reaching consequences. Hopeline cites an example of Megan Meier the misfire aged 13 who committed suicide after belittlement by a hacker (her mothers friend) that posed on MySpace as a boy aged 16 years. Hopline acknowledges that peer to peer cyber bullying is the most rampant, but its implications are not so severe. Effective curbing of cyber bullying would entail bring of ethical morals among the youth, which will help them suit to information technologies. Hopline argues that there can be no an over-reactive approach as parents barring their kids from accessing technology in attempt to curb cyber bullying. Hopline suggests that an appropriate ramification performance would entail the parents convening to open meetings, where then the parents can share and appropriately advice their kids on cyber bullying. Paren ts should be tactical so to dispel rebellion from their kids. Parents should not ignore the fact that all have under advanced risks of cyber bullying terms such as some kids are immune should not exist since all are sensitive to belittlement. Other intervention techniques should encompass teaching the kids on the importance of respect. In the nerve where kids are cyber-bullied, appropriate intervention procedures should be followed before the situation gets out of hand. It is factual that kids are major(ip) victims of cyber bullying. It is